A few years ago, JAMA published a series of articles related to obesity prevention and management.
In the world of research, there is a lot of pressure to go around. Continue reading
Over the years, we’ve conducted a number of studies that were designed to learn about families’ experiences and perceptions. While we’ve learned a lot, and applied some of this learning to how we provide care to children and families enrolled in pediatric weight management, it’s fair to say we could have done more to engage families in our research. Continue reading
The pursuit of ‘the truth’ in science can be tainted by how scientists conduct their work and lead their research programs.
While most of the research I do focuses on obesity and weight management, it’s been fun and educational to participate in projects that are outside of this area. One good example is…
Academic writing is notorious for being filled with jargon and difficult to understand. In our work, we try to be mindful of who might read our research, including families or our colleagues in the health care system, so that our data and interpretations are described easily and clearly. Continue reading
Not long ago, I posted information about an opinion paper authored by several leaders in the field of obesity and energy metabolism. In it, among other things, they argued that self-reported dietary data was, in general, of low quality and not very useful in the study of energy balance. They pushed for more methodological rigor and sophistication in the field.
Not surprisingly, a counter-point paper was recently published. In it, an independent group of researchers supported a different position (basically, ‘don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater’), which encourages the continued use of self-reported dietary data, but with caveats….including enhanced efforts to improve the quality of data collection as well as the application of self-reported dietary data in specific contexts.
The collection, analysis, and interpretation of dietary data is often a complex undertaking. These two thoughtful perspectives provide good ‘food for thought’ about many of the issues and assumptions made in this field of research.
Our research group spends time during monthly meetings to review manuscripts, which has proven to be a good educational opportunity for all of us. However, for those new to reviewing, it can be a daunting task – Where to start? What to include? How long should it be? What if I miss something? Continue reading